The High Court has observed that Parliament Speaker's ruling about an HC judge is ineffective and baseless in the eye of law.
In a ruling Speaker Abdul Hamid on June 18 said an HC judge (Judge AHM Shamsuddin Choudhury Manik) had violated the Constitution by making 'derogatory remark' about the Parliament and its Speaker.
The Speaker on that day also commented that the chief justice can take any step in this regard.
The HC on July 24 disposed of a writ petition challenging the legality of Speaker Abdul Hamid's June 18 ruling and said it would make some observations on the issue later.
The HC on Monday released the written copy of the observations.
In the observations, the HC said the Speaker's ruling is inconsistent with the Constitution and the rules of procedure of Parliament.
The Supreme Court possesses the oversee authority that no organ of the state could cross its limit of power given by the Constitution, the HC observations added.
On July 24, the HC disposed of the writ petition challenging the legality of the Speaker's ruling following a petition filed by Supreme Court lawyer AKM Shafiuddin.
In the petition, Shafiuddin prayed to the HC to direct the Speaker not to issue such rulings in future, saying that the Speaker could not rule against an SC judge as per parliament's rules of procedure.
কোন মন্তব্য নেই:
একটি মন্তব্য পোস্ট করুন